Psalm 19
The heavens are telling of the glory of God;
And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands.
Day to day pours forth speech,
And night to night reveals knowledge.
There is no speech, nor are there words;
Their voice is not heard.
Their line has gone out through all the earth,
And their utterances to the end of the world.
In them He has placed a tent for the sun,
Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber;
It rejoices as a strong man to run his course.
Its rising is from one end of the heavens,
And its circuit to the other end of them;
And there is nothing hidden from its heat.
Verses 1-4 are quite different than verses 5 and 6. In fact, verses 5 and 6 are so different that they beckoned me irresistibly to do something other than just try to explain them. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. Let's look first at verses 1-4 and see if we can sharpen the focus of David's vision here. It came into clearest focus for me when I detected four observations David has made.
1. First, from verse 2, "Day unto day pours forth speech, and night unto night declares knowledge." The observation here very simply is that knowledge comes through nature, day and night. At night the night sky speaks. In the day the day sky speaks. Or to be precise, speech pours forth. Nature does not whisper, it shouts and it shouts continually. We were all impressed with cinerama when the curved screen gave such a lifelike impression. And now you can walk into the Omnitheatre at the St. Paul Science Museum and hear all of the ooooh's and ahhhh's as people recline and see themselves enveloped in a domed screen, and then an hour later walk outside into a dome and a three dimensional drama ten million times bigger, more unpredictable and suspenseful, and hear not a single exclamation. Why?
Clyde Kilby, a literature teacher at Wheaton, gave this answer:
The fall of man can hardly be more forcefully felt than simply in noting what we all do with a fresh snowfall or the first buds of spring. On Monday they fill us with delight and meaning and on Tuesday we ignore them. No amount of shouting to us that this is all wrong changes the fact for very long ... Only some aesthetic power which is akin to God's own creativity has the capability for renewal, for giving us the power to see.
He thinks the reason we pay so little attention to God's omnitheatre is that we are fallen, sinful creatures. And I agree, because I cannot imagine that the angels in heaven get tired of God's beauty or that God Himself grows weary of the beauty of His Son. There is in heaven an ever renewed energy of perception and enjoyment. But fallen man is plagued with the proverb: "Familiarity breeds contempt."
But surely redemption means that we will be freed from that proverb. If we aren't, there can be no such thing as heaven but only a hell of increasing contemptuousness. And since our redemption has already begun in this age Christians ought to have better eyes than people in general for seeing the knowledge that every day and night pours forth. We ought to be the kind of people who walk out of the house in the morning with the same sense of suspense and expectancy with which we enter a new performance at the Omnitheatre.
2. The second observation of David's I want us to see is in verse 3, "There is no speech, nor are there words; their voice is not heard." In other words, the knowledge which pours forth from days and nights is visual not verbal. We know from verses 7 and following that David loved the verbal revelation of God, so he is not belittling that. But he also delights in the visual revelation of God and puts it first probably because it is completed by the verbal but also because it comes first not only in the order of creation (God made things for man before He spoke to man) but also in the order of every life (a child learns by seeing the world before he can understand languages).
We are told today that we live in a visual age instead of a verbal one. People need pictures not lectures. Television and movies have conspired to make us disenchanted with reasoning and enamor us with films. This is mostly true I think but partly misleading. Our minds have been weakened, but I am not sure our eyes have been strengthened. That you have been conditioned to crave to do something does not mean you are better at it. To be sure we are more visually dependent and hungry but I doubt that we are better at seeing than our forefathers.
There are at least two kinds of seeing: one is active and one is passive. Seeing actively means construing what you see, working on it with your mind to find meaning - not necessarily verbal meaning - but all the pattern and design the artist (whether God or man) intended. When a trained eye looks at Rembrandt's Paul in Prison he sees more than an untrained eye because his eyes are active and construe while the untrained eye is passive.
Well, My suspicion is that television in general does not train active seeing but rather encourages passive watching. Nobody goes to the Minneapolis Institute of Art to watch a painting; you go to see, to look at, to inspect. But you go home to watch T.V. Therefore, I am not very encouraged by our culture, because even though we are more visually dependent today I don't think we are more visually acute, or perceptive. Our skill in active seeing is no better and perhaps weaker than in the pre-T.V. days.
The upshot of this is that we all have a long way to go in becoming more adept at seeing the voiceless speech of nature. We need to apply ourselves to form the habits of active seeing rather than passive watching. More on just how to do this later.
3. The third observation I want us to see is in verse 4, "Yet their voice (or line) goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world." In other words, the voiceless knowledge poured forth by days and nights is available to everyone on the globe who is not physically blind. This is not a private or secret knowledge. The moon you see tonight is the same moon that shines down on Shanghai and Moscow and London. And not only that, it is the same moon that Shakespeare looked at when he wrote some of his sonnets. Nature is a transgeographical and trans-temporal language. The result of this is that all men can be held accountable for acknowledging the truth of what nature communicates. What does nature communicate?
4. That leads to observation number 4 which is found in verse 1: "The heavens are telling the glory of God and the firmament declares His handiwork." The voiceless, visual, universally available knowledge is that behind it all is a glorious God as maker of the world. The world is His handiwork and He is glorious. From this I have been taught three things. First, nature should lead us to belief in God and His glory as creator and therefore every man who can perceive nature is accountable to honor God and thank Him. Romans 1:19-20 says, "What can be known about God is plain to man because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature, namely His eternal power and deity, have been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse... "
If I did not have the witness of Scripture and the historical evidence of Jesus' life and resurrection I do not know if nature would be a sufficient argument to cause me to believe in God. But I think that in my most lucid and rational moments the existence of persons with consciences and reason and the existence of such an intricate and orderly scheme of nature would witness overwhelmingly to a personal, reasonable maker behind the universe. But we can be very glad we have the historical and verbal revelation of God, because most of us would be too stubborn I think to acknowledge God by nature alone.
The second thing verse one has shown me is that even after we believe in God it is nature that enables us to really know some of His attributes. C.S. Lewis (whom you all should read) put it like this: "Nature never taught me that there exists a God of glory and of infinite majesty. I had to learn that in other ways. But nature gave the word glory a meaning for me. I still do not know where else I could have found one. I do not see (either) how the 'fear' of 'God could have ever meant to me anything but the lowest, prudential efforts to be safe, if I had never seen certain ominous ravines and unapproachable crags." (The Four Loves, chapter 2)
For myself, I think I can say that I never really felt what it meant to love God until I had the experience of delighting in some awesome natural phenomena - a night sky, a waterfall in the mountain woods, and a sunrise through an Appalachian mist. I believe nature is the prep-school of our affections, readying them to delight in God.
The third thing that verse one has done for me is give me a keen sense of the eternality of God. If God made the universe, then there was a time when only God existed. That in itself begins to stagger my mind. I am tempted to say, besides God there was only nothingness. But that may create the picture of a large space with God by Himself in the center. But that is all wrong. Once there was only God. God was all there was. There was no room for anything else, not even nothingness, for all that was was God.
But then I am driven one step further and I realize that this God never had a beginning. He never came into being. And the effect that has on me is to make me tremble at His character. Every aspect of your character or personality is explainable as the result of some genetic trait or environmental or spiritual influence. You became the person you are. You grew and learned and changed and matured. But not God. He is good, long-suffering, reliable, honest, righteous, merciful, but he never became that way. He never learned anything from anybody; He never grew; He never changed; He never matured. He simply always was what He is from eternity before eternity before eternity. As unimaginable as it is, it says to me: He is sure. He is a rock. He cannot cease to be what He has been from all eternity, because there are no forces at work on Him which did not have their ultimate origin in Him and are limited by Him. So my faith in God's future is greatly strengthened by pondering the fact that He is the eternal, glorious creator.
To sum up the observations in verses 1 - 4: 1) Nature pours forth knowledge day and night (v. 2). 2) This knowledge is not verbal but visual (v. 3). 3) This visual knowledge is available for people all over the world to perceive, not just for some. 4) The knowledge imported is that God is a glorious creator.
Now we turn to verses 5 and 6 to find something very different. "In them He has placed a tent for the sun, which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber; it rejoices as a strong man to run his course. Its rising is from one end of the heavens, and its circuit to the other end of them; and there is nothing hidden from its heat." What is the Psalmist doing in these two verses? Noel read to me one of the Doonesbury cartoon strips by Gary Trudeau a while back. In it a fellow had just moved to California and was trying to fit in and learn mellow talk. So he read a few lines of poetry: "My heart can scarce contain the joy that cascades from the silver crescent cradling the stars." And the mellow talk translator said, "O, that would come out something like, 'O, wow, look at the moon!'"
The human heart will not be satisfied with mellow talk. The psalmist saw the sun rising and something happened inside of him. A joy that had to get out into words for others to enjoy but "O, wow, look at the sun," would not do. Instead he finds an analogy. The rising sun is like a bridegroom leaving his chamber on his way to get his lover. Verses 5 and 6 come as close as anything in Scripture to what Wordsworth called the "powerful overflow of spontaneous feeling recollected in tranquillity." They are simply a poetic expression of the joy that comes from beholding God's creation. They are not teaching, they are exulting. They don't so much inform as they do delight.
And the best thing to do with such poetry is to enjoy it and copy as well as our weak powers will allow us. Perhaps the best thing I can do to honor the intention of verses 5 and 6 is to show that I have tried, too, to find words for some of the joys I've had in God's creation. Maybe you'll get the bug. A joy unexpressed is probably only half as great.
THE GIFT OF SNOW
I tried to follow the advice
I gave my wife:
"Don't put your full weight down";
But, for my life,
I couldn't stay atop the snow.
Every fourth or fifth step
The fickle layer of ice would crunch, and in I'd go
Half way to the ground
In three feet of snow --
Like when you climb a stair
And inadvertently add a step in the air.
But there's a mystery in such stumbling
If a heart is given to mystery
More than to grumbling.
How odd that, with every jolt,
My head should be thrown back
To see the sky.
The fickle snow by giving way
Would have me face the heavens;
I wonder why.
At the time I thought it strange
My fall did not pert me to itself;
Now, my mind is turned to guesses:
Could it be--
Is there a possibility
The snow, knowing the heavens
From which it came,
And being gently laid to the earth
For a short and silent life,
Desires to point me to its early home
Where once it knew a hurling freedom
That I have never known?
Could it have known some good
That it would share with me;
That in its death beneath my feet
Would still pulge
As if it loved me more than life?
Is it more wise than I
To know that falling is an utter death
Unless one turns again
To that from which it fell?--
And more kind
That it should teach me, as I kill,
The lesson it must die to learn?
I have misnamed it, fickle snow:
Should I expect the words of the dying
So easily to flow, as of the living?
Its random crunch is not mere giving way,
It is a way of giving.
SUMMER, 1968
I was a surveyor then,
It was the summer of '68
And college joys were still
as lively as the wren
Who 'woke me early for those days;
And seminary lay ahead
And marriage in December,
So my work was to raise
Enough for two to get a start.
But looking back upon those weeks,
It's not the memories of school
I had, nor that my heart
Was filled with joy, which pleases now.
No, my pleasure now springs from
A lonely image in my mind
Of one rare day and in it how
The sun and wind and farming land
Conspired to stir my soul.
A railroad was the border
Of the farm and Wayne's command
Was that I wait and hold the rod
While he and Jim walked to the truck
Then drove down to the trestle
So they could set the tripod
And mount the gun with care to shoot
The farmer's northern boundary.
There I was alone, standing
Between the shiny tracks, mute,
As they lay in wait for a noisy freight:
A lengthy solitude known only
To an elevated, unbent track
Which stretched its merging rails straight
Out of sight to east and west;
A broad and lofty solitude
Soothing my soul's cramped longing for
Expanse. I felt a biting zest
For all the shapes, color and motion
That stretched my eyes across
The brilliant, earthy fields.
One quarter was a golden ocean
Streaming and shifting its tides
In shimmering variations of light
And dark. Another, to the west,
Was where the family resides
Amid a grove a giant oaks
Along a shady stream:
A busy farming family,
Tawny and strong, the kind of folks
Who know the joys of evening rest.
The quarters to the north were shaped
And separated by a brook
Which with its laughing flow gave jest
By shaping two pianos out
Of a spreading bean field
Whose long green chords
Vibrated with a song about
The great musician Aeolus.
The happy fields and peopled grove
Engaged my soul in quiet joy
And left my body tremulous,
Tingling in solitude,
Until a yellow flag
From the distant Railroad trestle
Announced my duty with a rude