This is a video dealing with Brainoutys video attacking bbbfohio stating that he didn't know Greek because he supported the King James reading in Acts 8:37.
In fact, it is Brainouty who shows her own lack of knowledge of Greek by appealing to the 'kai' in Acts 8:38, as if it MUST refer to only Acts 8:36.
In fact, a question is asked in Acts 8:36, which if Acts 8:37 is omitted, is left unanswered. All the modern Gr. texts have Acts 8:36 as a question.
The reason that the verse is left out of many modern versions (but not all) is due to the issue of manusrcript evidence, not the Greek text.
The textual evidence is cited below
....the passage also appears in a vast number of other Old Latin manuscripts (such as l, m, e, r, ar, ph, and gig). It also is found in the Greek Codex E (eighth century) and several Greek manuscripts (36, 88, 97, 103, 104, 242, 257, 307, 322, 323, 385, 429, 453, 464, 467, 610, 629, 630, 913, 945, 1522, 1678, 1739, 1765, 1877, 1891, and others). While there are differences even among these texts as to precise wording, the essence of the testimony still remains where it has been removed from other manuscripts.[24] Additionally, Irenaeus (202 AD), Cyprian (258 AD), Ambrosiaster (forth century), Pacian (392 AD), Ambrose (397 AD), Augustine (430 AD), and Theophylact (1077 AD) all cite Ac 8:37.'