http://www.jamesflanders.com/3/category/galatians/1.html

Is there a difference between the message of Paul and the message of Peter? What does Paul mean when he speaks of the evangel for the circumcision and for the un-circumcision? Have we been missing something?

In this audio from Galatians chapter 2, James Flanders will take a look at the Law of Moses, the message of Peter, the message of Paul, and what they have to say to you and me.

7 But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as the gospel for the circumcised was to Peter 8 (for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles), 9 and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised. 10 They desired only that we should remember the poor, the very thing which I also was eager to do. (Galatians 2:7-10)

http://youtu.be/81KMq__xJiw

http://jamesflanders.bandcamp.com/

Arizona (not a pastor)
Bible study
missing the point for most of his life.
universal reconciliation