Philippians 2:5-11 is one of the most important passages regarding knowing who Jesus really is and what His nature is.

Only the Trinitarian version of Jesus fits what Paul wrote in Php 2:5-11.

Paul shows us in Php 2:6 that Jesus existing in "the form of God", means He is equal with God. The Greek word for form is "morphē". Paul uses this word to describe the nature of Jesus. The word not only refers to the inner reality, substance and nature of something, but also the outer display. So Jesus is equal to God in substance (Col 2:9) but is also equal to God in radiating His glory (Heb 1:3).

In Php 2:10-11, Paul quotes Isaiah 45:23 (which is only about YHWH) and applies it to Jesus, therefore identifying Jesus as YHWH. Paul also applies Isaiah 45:23 to God the Father in Romans 14:11. Paul recognized and taught that God the Father and the Son are distinct persons yet are BOTH equally YHWH. Php 2:5-11 definitely distinguishes Jesus from the Father (in person-hood). There are 2 divine persons in view here by Paul.

The Oneness and Unitarian versions of Jesus cannot fit Paul's words in Php 2:5-11. Paul is saying that Jesus was 100% equal with God in nature, but made Himself nothing (or emptied Himself), in humility, in order to become a man in service to others. The emptying is figurative language used by Paul to demonstrate the Son's attitude of humility and means by becoming a servant and man: He was made a man of no reputation (He added humanity to His person, He didn't minus anything). The non-Trinitarian view of Jesus would result in the absurd idea that a man became a verse in v.7.

" For he, who had always been God by nature, did not cling to his privileges as God's equal, but stripped himself of every advantage by consenting to be a slave by nature and being born a man." (Php 2:6-7, Phillips Modern English)

Questions for Unitarians to answer under my video:

-What does it mean for your version of Jesus to exist "in the form of God"?
-Why does Paul mention Christ having "equality" [isos] with God? Was Paul deliberately confusing people? Did Jesus have equality with God or not?
-Paul applied Isaiah 45:23 to God the Father in Romans 14:11. Is this evidence that the Father is YHWH? Or is this no evidence? Why does Paul apply the same verse to Jesus in Php 2:10-11? Is this not evidence of Jesus being YHWH, as Romans 14:11 proves the Father is YHWH?
-We know YHWH does not share His glory with another (Isaiah 48:11), so is it fine for your version of the Father that a creature has the highest name and every knee bows to a creature and every tongue confesses that a creature is Lord (Php 2:9-11)?
-According to metaphysics, a being ALWAYS begets the same being. If Jesus is not the same being as His own Father, is God and His Son the only exception?