This is an answer to the 'challenge' put out by White on the reading found in Rev.16:5.
His contention is that the KJB defender cannot defend the view that there are no errors in the KJB because of the lack of textual support for Rev.16:5
His view is that since the reading of Rev.16:5 has no textual support (It does have TR support, Beza and Elzevir), it must be an error.
For it to be an error it must be shown to be WRONG scripturally. So, White wants to set up his own standard on what constitutes a provable error.
The KJB translators trusted the reading, and the reading is found in modern bibles such as the YLT, the NKJ, KJ21, KJ2000, KJ3 by Green
The translators said that the hand of God was upon their work and that is the basis for defending the KJB as perfect, not any textual issues.