Excerpt from The "Summa Theologica" Of St. Thomas Aquinas, Vol. 3: Supplement, Qq; LXIX.-LXXXVI.; Literally Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province
Objection I. It would seem that places are not appointed to receive souls after death. For as Boethius says (de Wise men are agreed that incorporeal things are not in a place, and this agrees with the words of Augustine (gen. Ad Lit. Xii): We can answer without hesitation that the soul is not conveyed to corporeal places, except with a body, or that it is not conveyed locally. Now the soul separated from the body is without a body, as Augustine also says (ibid). Therefore it is absurd to assign any places for the reception of souls.
Obj. 2. Further, Whatever has a definite place has more in common with that place than with any other. Now separated souls, like certain other spiritual substances, are indifferent to all places; for it cannot be said that they agree with certain bodies, and differ from others, Since they are utterly removed from all corporeal conditions. Therefore places should not be assigned for their reception.
Obj. 3. Further, Nothing is assigned to separated souls after death, except what conduces to their punishment or to their reward. But a corporeal place cannot conduce to their punishment or reward, Since they receive nothing from bodies. Therefore definite places should not be assigned to receive them.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at
www.forgottenbooks.comwww.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Thomas Aquinas was an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism, known as Doctor Angelicus and Doctor Communis.
He was the foremost classical proponent of natural theology, and the father of the Thomistic school of philosophy and theology. His influence on Western thought is considerable, and much of modern philosophy was conceived as a reaction against, or as an agreement with, his ideas, particularly in the areas of ethics, natural law and political theory.
The philosophy of Aquinas has exerted enormous influence on subsequent Christian theology, especially that of the Roman Catholic Church, extending to Western philosophy in general, where he stands as a vehicle and modifier of Aristotelianism, which he fused with the thought of Augustine.
... Show more