Read & Study the Bible Online - Bible Portal
Orthodoxy

Orthodoxy

by G.K. Chesterton
This book is meant to be a companion to "Heretics," and to put the positive side in addition to the negative. Many critics complained of the book because it merely criticised current philosophies without offering any alternative philosophy. This book is an attempt to answer the challenge. It is the purpose of the writer to attempt an explanation, not of whether the Christian Faith can be believed, but of how he personally has come to believe it. The book is therefore arranged upon the positive principle of a riddle and its answer. It deals first with all the writer's own solitary and sincere speculations and then with the startling style in which they were all suddenly satisfied by the Christian Theology. The writer regards it as amounting to a convincing creed. But if it is not that it is at least a repeated and surprising coincidence.
Paperback, 168 pages

Published July 30th 2008 by Waking Lion Press (first published 1908)

Book Quotes
But the new rebel is a sceptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be really a revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it. Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of women, and then he writes another book (about the sex problem) in which he insults it himself. He curses the Sultan because Christian girls lose their virginity, and then curses Mrs. Grundy because they keep it. As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is waste of time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a policeman for killing a peasant, and then prove by the highest philosophical principles that the peasant ought to have killed himself. A man denounces marriage as a lie, and then denounces aristocratic profligates for treating it as a lie. He calls a flag a bauble, and then blames the oppressors of Poland or Ireland because they take away that bauble. The man of this school goes first to a political meeting, where he complains that savages are treated as if they were beasts; then he takes his hat and umbrella and goes on to a scientific meeting, where he proves that they practically are beasts. In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite sceptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines. In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling on morality; in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men. Therefore the modern man in revolt has become practically useless for all purposes of revolt. By rebelling against everything he has lost his right to rebel against anything. It
Ocupar-me-ei do primeiro argumento citado: a ideia de que o Cristianismo pertence à idade das trevas. Quanto a esse ponto, não me satisfaz ler as modernas generalizações: li um pouco de História. E, pela História, verifiquei que o Cristianismo, longe de pertencer à idade das trevas, era o único caminho, através da idade das trevas, que não era sombrio. Era uma ponte brilhante que ligava duas civilizações também brilhantes. Se alguém disser que a Fé nasceu na ignorância e na selvageria, a resposta é simples: não nasceu. Nasceu na civilização do Mediterrâneo, em pleno verão do Império Romano. O Mundo estava repleto de céticos, e o panteísmo era tão claro como o Sol, quando Constantino pregou a cruz ao mastro. É inteiramente verdade que, depois, o navio naufragou: mas é ainda mais extraordinário que o mesmo navio voltou a aparecer novamente, pintado de novo, reluzente e com a cruz ainda no topo do mastro. Esta é a admirável coisa que a religião realizou: converteu um navio naufragado num submarino. A arca viveu sob o peso das águas: depois de termos estado sepultados debaixo dos destroços de dinastias e clãs, levantamo-nos e lembramo-nos de Roma. Se a nossa fé tivesse sido um simples capricho de um império que se desmoronava, esse capricho teria tido, também, o seu crepúsculo, e, se a civilização emergisse de novo à superfície (e muitas delas não emergiram mais!), teria sido sob algum novo pendão bárbaro. Mas a Igreja cristã foi a última vida de uma sociedade velha e foi também a primeira vida de uma sociedade nova. Pegou um povo que estava se esquecendo de como se construía um arco e ensinou-o a inventar o arco gótico. Numa palavra: a coisa mais absurda que se pode dizer da Igreja é aquela que todos temos ouvido dizer a seu respeito. Como se pode afirmar que a Igreja pretende arrastar-nos para a idade das trevas? A Igreja foi a única coisa que sempre procurou libertar-nos dela.

Group of Brands